Why should the fact that a blouse of Hillary Clinton's revealed a tiny (according to the report) bit of cleavage be of any import at all to a political blogger? Tim Graham found a mention of the aforesaid blouse by a Washington Post fashion reporter--fashion, mind you--worthy of an entire column. It's here, if your stomach is strong enough: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2007/07/20/washpost-fashionista-hillary-showing-cleavage-no-one-wants-see
But perhaps you'll just take my word for it. It's revolting. The right is so terrified of Senator Clinton that they fasten on her clothes as grounds for objection. Now suppose she sobbed her way through a speech on the Senate floor, the way Boehner did? They'd have a heyday with that, I imagine, all about hormones and feminine weakness and blah blah blah.
These folks think that Islam is mysognistic, I know, because they say so. I fail to see that they're any different.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment